January 18th 2013
10:16:22 AM
| Viewing Page 1 of 3 (Total Entries: 25) |
|
|
|
January 18th 2013 10:16:22 AM |
|
What is your name? |
alex schotman |
How did you find this website? |
Very good indeed. |
Where are you from? |
the Netherlands |
Please enter your comments? |
Really love your website. Some of the regular \"Fire & Fury\" scenarios are to big for my table I enjoyed playing both Antietam and Chickamauga broken down in three smaller scenarios. The fight over Burnside Bridge is my favourite! |
Email
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 26th 2012 01:04:26 PM |
|
What is your name? |
Oplon Games |
What is the title of your website: |
Empires at War 1805 |
Type a quick description of your website: |
Napoleonic Wargame |
How did you find this website? |
google search |
Where are you from? |
Greece |
Please enter your comments? |
Dear Wargamers! we are a new company from Athens making strategy games played over a web browser. Our current project is called "Empires at War 1805" and is played only against human opponents. In the game you lead one of the 17 dominant powers of the era, trying to make your empire the greatest in Europe. The game has a detailed economic & trading system, accurate Napoleonic army lists, interesting political options, and strong Historical flavour. We have launched a fund raising campaign here: http://www.indiegogo.com/eaw-1805?a=1582854 Please check on the game, and if you like it, help us to spread the news! We are making wargames, not social games, so we count on wargamers support to launch this! If you need more information, manuals, screenshots, questions or whatever - please contact us :) We also run a special offer during this period, your wargaming club can start you own game (17 players can fit into one game), and split the countries between you as you see fit. And yes, this game will be completely free so that you can see if you like it :) We would love to hear from you soon! Kind Regards, Oplon Games |
Email
Website
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 21st 2011 04:32:58 PM |
|
What is your name? |
Randy |
How did you find this website? |
google search |
Where are you from? |
Alabama Gulf Coast |
Please enter your comments? |
Drawings were excellent, Great for research, Thank-you |
Email
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 23rd 2008 02:12:57 PM |
|
What is your name? |
neil |
Please enter your comments? |
Fantastic, thank you for your help. sadly I won't be at the show, i'll be on holiday |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 23rd 2008 12:41:25 PM |
|
What is your name? |
Dave |
Please enter your comments? |
Base sizes Brigade command: same as inf. but with command figures and flag. Corps Commander: 1.5 by 1.5” officer and a couple of others with flag Divisional Commander: 1” front by 1 and 1/18” depth, 1 mounted figure. Infantry: 3 to 5 on a base, 1” front and 0.75” depth. Cavalry: 2 to a base, 1” frontage, and 1 and 1/8” deep. Dismounted: 2 dismounted figures, base 1” wide and 0.75” deep. Artillery: 1 gun and 2 or 3 crew on a base 1” wide and 1.5” deep. Limbers: on bases 1” wide and as deep as necessary. Horseholders: 1 man with 2-4 horses, base 1.5” wide, 1 and 1/8” deep We generally mount all markers on pennies. Rules may be hard to find now, as it was really popular in the 90s, but I would be happy to email you copies of the quick play sheets if you need them. Are you likely to be at Warfare in November? there will be a F&F demo game there! Hope that helps, Dave. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 23rd 2008 08:59:38 AM |
|
What is your name? |
Neil |
How did you find this website? |
top of google search engine |
Where are you from? |
birmingham |
Please enter your comments? |
Hi. I am putting together a union army of the potomac with a view to playing F&F rules when can get a set. Could someone please advise me on base sizes for the following troop types and how many figures would there be per base Army Commander Divisional Commander Infantry Skirmishers Cavalry (mtd) Cavalry (dismounted) Artillery Ammunition Wagons Thank you in advance kind regards Neil |
Email
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 9th 2008 11:00:43 PM |
|
What is your name? |
Dave |
What is the title of your website: |
This one |
Please enter your comments? |
With regard to the Bull Run problem, there was indeed only one Cocke. His brigade was posted initially to cover Lewis' Ford, evidently a big brigade, as the Reb ones often were at the beginning of the war, because it was later split. When the Union flank attack was recognised and Beauregard went to go organise the counter attack, Johnstone was further back, with an overview. He fed Beauregard with troops, from reserves and as they arrived on the field. Two of these were 8 Virg. and 49 Virg., part of Cockes Brigade. The only way to reflect this in the game I guess, was to split Cocke's Brigade, and mark the part without commander with a (-). You will note in the scenario, the other part of the brigade is pinned down until a particular time in the battle. Hope that helps a little, best regards, Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 8th 2008 12:18:29 AM |
|
What is your name? |
Dave |
Please enter your comments? |
I'll have a look and see what I can find out and get back to you, regards, Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 7th 2008 09:53:59 PM |
|
What is your name? |
Reg Boulton |
How did you find this website? |
Web search |
Where are you from? |
Pontefract, West Yorkshire |
Please enter your comments? |
In the 1st Battle of Bull Run scenario in the Great Eastern Battles Book Cocke's Brigade is shown twice with different strengths. ( One ref. if suffixed (-) ). I was told that there were two different Brigade commanders called Cocke on the field but all my reading of the battle does not bear this out. Can anybody explain this apparent anomaly? |
Email
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 5th 2008 10:34:46 AM |
|
What is your name? |
dave hutton |
Where are you from? |
bath, england |
Please enter your comments? |
hi im trying without sucess to obtain the fire & fury western scenario book, can anyone send me a link to purchase this book, cheers dave |
Email
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Viewing Page 1 of 3 (Total Entries: 25) |